![Espiral Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad [eISSN: 2594-021X]](http://espiral.cucsh.udg.mx/public/journals/10/pageHeaderLogoImage_es_ES.jpg)
Associations and social goods. The conceptual and methodological discussion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/espiral.v25i71.5753Keywords:
Associations, associative goods, commons, collective action and nonprofit organisations.Abstract
This paper examines and discusses some propositions for the conceptualization of associative goods. The purpose is to explore if those goods generated by the participation of citizens can be conceptualized as commons. The argument is supported on the assumption that associations are spaces of free participation built upon a particular kind of rules and relations for the use and distribution of the resources and assets shared. Following this line, the paper identifies the actives that could be characterized as commons in two spheres: those that are shared and generated as result of the integration of members to associative groups, and those generated by associations as result of their actionsDownloads
References
Alexander, J. (2006). The Civil Sphere. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162509.001.0001
Aligica, P. D. (2016). “Neither market, nor state domain:Nonprofits from the Ostroms' theoretical perspective". Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quartely, 45(45), 43-60.
Argandoña, A. (1998). “The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good”. Journal of Busines, 17(9-10), 1093-1102. doi: 10.1023/A:1006075517423
Beagle, D. R. (2006). The information commons handbook. Nueva York: Neal-Schuman, Publishers, Inc.
Bollier, D. (2011). “The commons, short and sweet”. News and perspectives on the commons. Recuperado de: http:// www.bollier.org/commons-short-and-sweet
–––––– y Helfrich, S. (2012). “Introduction”, en D. Bollier, y S. Helfrich (eds.), The wealth of the commons. A world beyond market & state [version en línea] (s/p). Massachusetts: Levellers Press. Recuperado de: http://www. wealthofthecommons.org/contents
Chanial, P., y Laville, J. (2013). “Asociativismo”, en A. D. Cattani, J. Coraggio, y J. Laville (eds.), Diccionario de la otra economía (pp. 36-42). Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Recuperado de: http://www.jeanlouislaville.fr/es/diccionario-de-la-otra-economia/
Coriat, B. (dir.) (2015). Le retour des communs : La crise de l’idéologie propriétaire. París: Éditions Les liens qui Libèrent.
David, P. M., y Le Dévédec, N. (2016). “Des communs au commun: Un nouvel horizon sociologique”. SociologieS, s/p. Recuperado de : http://sociologies.revues.org/5652
Donati, P. (1999). La ciudadanía societaria. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
Edwards, M. (2008). Just another emperor. The myths and realities of philanthrocapitalism. Nueva York: Demos: A Network for Ideas & Action and the Young Foundation.
–––––– (2011). “Introduction: Civil society and the geometry of human relations” en M. Edwards (ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 3-14). Nueva York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780195398571.001.0001
Esping Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
–––––– (1999). The social foundations of postindustrial economies. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198742002.001.0001
Estivill, J. (2015). “Prólogo: el asociacionismo vector de la economía solidaria”, en J. Laville (aut.), Asociarse para el bien común. Tercer sector, economía social y economía solidaria (pp. 7-25). Barcelona: Icaria-Antrazyt.
Grouiez, P. (2015). “Le retour des communs”. Revue de la Régulation, 18(2º semestre), 1-18. Recuperado de: https://regulation.revues.org/11549#text
Gutwirth, S., y Stengers, I. (2016). “Le droit a l’epreuve des commons”. Revue Juridique de l’Environnement, 2016(2), 306-343. Recuperado de: https://works.bepress.com/serge_gutwirth/119/
Hardin, G. (1968). “The Tragedy of the Commons”. Science Journal, 162(3859), 1243–1248. doi: 10.1080/19390450903037302.
Hardt, M., y Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Helfrich, S. (2008). “Commons: ámbitos o bienes comunes, procomún o lo nuestro”, en S. Helfrich (comp.), Genes, bytes y emisiones: bienes comunes y ciudadanía (pp. 42-48). México: Fundación Heinrich Böll.
Hess, C. (2008). “Mapping the New Commons, in Governing Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges” (documento presentado en la 12th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study the Commons). University of Gloucestershire,Cheltenham, Inglaterra. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1356835
Laville, J. (2015). Asociarse para el bien común. Tercer sector, economía social y economía solidaria. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial.
–––––– Young, D. R., y Eynaud, P. (2015). “Introduction”, en J. Laville, D. R. Young, y P. Eynaud (eds.), Civil society, the third sector and social enterprise. Governance and democracy (pp. 1-29). Nueva York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526102720.00006
Levine, P. (2011). “Civic knowledge”, en M. Edwards (ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 362-374). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Lohmann, R. (1992). The Commons: New Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizations, Voluntary Action and Phinathropy.Estados Unidos: Indiana University.
Nonini, D. M. (2006). “Introduction: The global idea of ‘the commons’”. Social Analysis, 50(5), 164-177.
Nyssens, M., y Petrella, F. (2015). “The social and solidarity economy and Ostrom’s approach to common pool resources. Towards a better understanding of institutional diversity”, en J. Laville, D. R. Young, y P. Eynaud (eds.), Civil society, the third sector and social enterprise. Governance and democracy (pp. 178-190). Nueva York: Routledge.
Orsi, F. (2013). “Elinor Ostrom et les faisceaux de droits: L’ouverture d’un nouvel espace pour penser la propriété commune”. Revue de la régulation, 14, s/p. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.10471
Ostrom, E. (1992). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Londres: Cambridge University Press.
–––––– (2014). “Más allá de los mercados y los Estados: gobernanza policéntrica de sistemas económicos complejos. Conferencia de recepción del premio Nobel de Economía (2009, diciembre)”. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 76(especial), 15-70.
Soloaga, I. (coord.) (2010). Evaluación externa 2010: efectos del Programa de Coinversión Social en la construcción del capital social. México: COLMEX, SEDESOL INDESOL. Recuperado de: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/2/6/21/Informe_Final_Eval_Capital_Social.pdf
Walzer, M. (1991). “The idea of civil society: A path to social reconstruction”. Dissen, 39, 293-304.
Warren, M. (2001). Democracy in Association. Political Theory Series. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
–––––– (2009). “Civil society and democracy”, en M. Edwards (ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 377-390). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Open access policy
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
In accordance with the legislation of copyright, Espiral Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad recognizes and respects the moral rights of the authors, as well as their equity ownership, which will be given to the journal to for diffusion on open access. Espiral does not charge authors for sending and processing their articles for publication.
The authors are able to engage in independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article’s version published in Espiral (for example, to include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in Espiral.
For all of the above, the authors (s) must send a format of a letter of transfer of property rights on the first publication duly completed and signed by the author (s). This format can be sent via email in PDF file to the email espiral.udeg@gmail.com. (Letter of transfer of author property rights)
