Estructuras del sentimiento de inseguridad. Posiciones ante la violencia y estratificación social en México.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/eees.v29i83.7226Palabras clave:
Inseguridad, Violencia, Estructuras de sentimiento, México, Estratificación socialResumen
La inseguridad es un componente de nuestras sociedades contemporáneas, y define muchos de los comportamientos sobre dónde vivir, dónde trabajar o con quién relacionarse. Estos sentimientos de inseguridad suceden en un contexto de creciente polarización social, especialmente en el contexto latinoamericano. El objetivo del artículo es combinar ambos atributos, a través del concepto de estructuras de sentimiento. Así, nos preguntamos si diferentes estructuras del sentimiento de inseguridad expresan o influyen en la estratificación social en México. Para ello, analizamos la Encuesta Nacional sobre Victimización y Percepción de la Seguridad Pública 2018 (INEGI), lo que nos permitió encontrar cuatro estructuras del sentimiento de inseguridad: el grupo de los confiados, el de los precavidos, el de los evasivos y el de los pasivos. Estas estructuras de sentimiento se vincularon estrechamente con diversas variables de estratificación socioespacial, lo que nos permitió asegurar que estamos ante un prometedor concepto para analizar los procesos actuales de estratificación social.Descargas
Citas
-Adlakha, D., Hipp, J. A., y Brownson, R. C. (2016). Neighborhood based differences in walkability, physical activity, and weight status in India. Journal of Transport & Health, 3(4), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.10.008
-Anderson, B. y Holden, A. (2008). Affective Urbanism and the Event of Hope. Space and Culture, 11(2), 142-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331208315934
-Anderson, B. (2016). Neoliberal Affects. Progress in Human Geography, 40(6), 734-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515613167
-Archer, L., Hollingworth, S. y Halsall, A. (2007). 'University's not for Me –I'm a Nike Person': Urban, Working-Class Young People's Negotiations of Style, Identity and Educational Engagement'. Sociology, 41(2), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507074798
-Benz, T. A. (2014). At the Intersection of Urban Sociology and Criminology: Fear of Crime and the Postindustrial City. Social Compass, 8(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12119
-Berger, R. (2018). Crime in Greater Los Angeles: Experiences and Perceptions of Local Urban Residents. Current Urban Studies, 6(2), 260-277. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2018.62015
-Blackshaw, T. (2009). Structure of Feeling. En T. Blackshaw y G. Crawford (Eds.), The SAGE Dictionary of Leisure Studies (p. 200). London: Sage.
-Bobea, L. (2015). Santo Domingo: criminogenic violence and resilience. En K. Koonings y D. Kruijt, Dirk (Eds.), Violence and Resilience in Latin American Cities (pp. 134-154). London: Zed Books.
-Britto, S. (2013). 'Diffuse anxiety': the role of economic insecurity in predicting fear of crime. Journal of Crime and Justice, 36(1), 18-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2011.631399
-Caldeira, T. (2000). City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-Cardia, N. (2002). The Impact of Exposure to Violence in Sao Paulo: Accepting Violence or Continuing Horror? En S. Rotker (Ed.), Citizens of Fear: Urban Violence in Latin America (pp. 152-186). New Brunswick: Rugers University Press.
-Ceccato, V. (2012). The Urban Fabric of Crime and Fear. En V. Ceccato (Ed.), The Urban Fabric of Crime and Fear (pp. 3-36). London: Springer.
-Coleman, R., Tombs, S., y Whyte, D. (2005). Capital, Crime Control and Statecraft in the Entrepreneurial City. Urban Studies, 42(13), 2511-2530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500380428
-Dammert, L. (2012). Fear and Crime in Latin America. Redefining State Society Relations. London: Routledge.
-Davis, D. (2007). Urban Violence, Quality of Life, and the Future of Latin American Cities: The Dismal Record so Far and the Search for New Analytical Frameworks to Sustain the Bias Towards Hope. En A. M. Garland, M. Massoumi y B. A. Ruble (Eds.), Global Urban Poverty. Setting the Agenda (pp. 57-89). Washington: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
-Davis, D. (2013). Zero-Tolerance Policing, Stealth Real Estate Development, and the Transformation of Public Space: Evidence from Mexico City. Latin American Perspectives, 40(2), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X12467761
-Desmond Arias, E. y Davis Rodriges, C. (2006). The Myth of Personal Security: Criminal Gangs, Dispute Resolution, and Identity in Rio de Janeiro's Favelas. Latin American Politics & Society, 48(4), 53-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2006.tb00365.x
-De Vries, F. (2008). Megamall, Generic City. En S. Nuttall, y A. Mbembe, (Eds.) Johannesburg. The Elusive Metropolis (pp. 297-306). London: Duke University Press.
-Dirksmeier, P. (2016). Providing places for structures of feeling and hierarchical complementarity in urban theory: Re-reading Williams' The Country and the City. Urban Studies, 53(5), 884-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015571241
-Dowling, R. (2009). Geographies of identity: landscapes of class. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 833-839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508104998
-Dupuis, A. y Thorns, D. (2008). Gated Communities as Exemplars of 'Forting up' Practices in a Risk Society. Urban Policy and Research, 26(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140802026800
-CEPAL (2019). Social Panorama of Latin America. Santiago: United Nations.
-Figueroa Martinez, C., Hodgson, F., Mullen C., y Timms, P. (2019). Walking through deprived neighbourhoods: Meanings and constructions behind the attributes of the built environment. Travel Behaviour and Society, 16, 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.05.006
-Foster, S., Knuiman, M., Hooper, P., Christian, H., y Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Do changes in residents' fear of crime impact their walking? Longitudinal results from RESIDE. Preventive Medicine, 62, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.02.011
-Furedi, F. (2007). Culture of Fear Revisited. New York: Continuum.
-Galindo, C., Frissard, P. y Osorio, D. (2019). Atlas de Homicidios México 2018. Ciudad de México: México Unido Contra la Delincuencia A.C.
-Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-Glasze, G., Webster, C., y Frantz, K. (2006). Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives. London: Routledge.
-Goldstein, D. M. (2010). Toward a Critical Anthropology of Security. Current Anthropology, 51(4), 487-517. https://doi.org/10.1086/655393
-Glebbeek, M.-L., y Koonings, K. (2015). Between Morro and Asfalto. Violence, insecurity and socio-spatial segregation in Latin American cities. Habitat International, 54, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.012
-Hae, L. (2012). The Gentrification of Nightlife and the Right to the City. Regulating Spaces of Social Dancing in New York. London: Routledge.
-Harris, E., Nowicki, M., y Brickell, K. (2019). On-edge in the impasse: Inhabiting the housing crisis as structure-of-feeling. Geoforum, 101, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.001
-Herbert, S. y Brown, E. (2006). Conceptions of Space and Crime in the Punitive Neoliberal City. Antipode, 38(4), 755-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00475.x
-Hicks-Barlett, S. (2000). Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Labyrinth of Working and Parenting in a Poor Community. En S. Danziger y C. Lin, (Eds.), Coping with Poverty. The Social Contexts of Neighborhood, Work, and Family in the African-American Community (pp. 27-51). Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
-Highmore, B. (2016). Formations of Feelings, Constellations of Things. Cultural Studies Review, 22(1), 144-167. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v22i1.4413
-Instituto Nacional de Geografía, Estadística e Informática –INEGI (2019). Encuesta Nacional de Victimización y Percepción sobre la Seguridad Pública: Principales Resultados. Aguascalientes: INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/envipe/2019/doc/envipe2019_presentacion_nacional.pdf
-Instituto Nacional de Geografía, Estadística e Informática –INEGI (2020). Encuesta Nacional de Seguridad Pública Urbana, Primer Trimestre 2020: Principales Resultados. Aguascalientes: INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/ensu/doc/ensu2020_marzo_presentacion_ejecutiva.pdf
-Jeffery, B. (2018). 'I Probably Would Never Move, but Ideally Like I'd Love to Move this Week': Class and Residential Experience, Beyond Elective Belonging. Sociology, 52(2), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516668124
-Leal Martínez, A. (2016). "You cannot be here": The Urban Poor and the Specter of the Indian in Neoliberal Mexico City". The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 21(3), 539-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12196
-Lemanski, C. (2004). A new apartheid? The spatial implications of fear of crime in Cape Town, South Africa. Environment & Urbanization, 16(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600201
-Lopez da Souza, M. (2014). Phobopolis: Violence, Fear and Sociopolitical Fragmentation of the Space of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. En F. Kraas, S. Aggarwal, M. Coy y G. Mertins, (Eds.), Megacities: Our Global Future (pp.151-164). London: Springer.
-Low, S. (2001). The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the Discourse of Urban Fear. American Anthropologist, 103(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.45
-Low. S. (2008). Fortification of Residential Neighbourhoods and the New Emotions of Home. Housing, Theory and Society, 25(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090601151038
-Mason, P., Kearns, A., y Livingston, M. (2013). "Safe Going": The influence of crime rates and perceived crime and safety on walking in deprived neighbourhoods. Social Science & Medicine, 91, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.011
-Matthews, S. (2015). Change and Theory in Raymond Williams' Structure of Feeling. Pretexts: Literary and Cultural Studies, 10(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10155490120106032
-Mycoo, M. (2006). The retreat of the upper and middle classes to gated communities in the poststructural adjustment era: The case of Trinidad. Environment and Planning A, 38, 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37323
-Nava, N. (2006). Domestic Cosmopolitanism and Structures of Feeling: The Specificity of London. En N. Yuval-Davis, K. Kannabiran, y U. Vieten (Eds.), The Situates Politics of Belonging (pp. 42-53). London: Sage.
-Nenga, S. K. (2003). Social Class and Structures of Feeling in Women's Childhood Memories of Clothing, Food and Leisure. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(2), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241602250884
-Pantazis, C. (2000). Fear of Crime, Vulnerability and Poverty: Evidence from the British Crime Survey. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 414-436. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/40.3.414
-Pare, P.-P. y Felson, R. (2014). Income inequality, poverty and crime across nations. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 435-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12083.
-Pow, C.-P. (2013). Consuming private security: Consumer citizenship and defensive urbanism in Singapore. Theoretical Criminology, 17(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612472782
-Rebotier, J. (2011). Security practices and inequalities in Caracas. New drivers of an old logic? Justice Spatiale-Spatial Justice, 4, 1-17.
-Roitman, S. y Giglio, M. A. (2010). Latin American Gated Communities: The Latest Symbols of Historic Social Segregation. En S. Bagaeen, y O. Uduku (Eds.), Gated Communities: Social Sustainability in Contemporary and Historical Gated Developments (pp. 63-78). London: Earthscan.
-Sanborn, H. (2016). Turn It Up. Affects, Structures of Feeling, and Face-to-Face Education. En H. Sanborn (Ed.), Turns of Event. Nineteenth-Century American Literary Studies in Motion (pp. 13-22). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-Schuermans, N. (2011). Ambivalent geographies of encounter inside and around the fortified homes of middle class Whites in Cape Town. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(4), 679-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-013-9352-7
-Schuermans, N. (2016). Enclave urbanism as telescopic urbanism? Encounters of middle class whites in Cape Town. Cities, 59, 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.002
-Skogan, W. G., y Maxfied, M. G. (1981). Coping with Crime: Individual and Neighborhood Reactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
-Smulovitz, C. (2003). Citizen Insecurity and Fear: Public and Private Responses in Argentina. H. Fruhling, y J.S. Tulchin (Eds.), Crime and Violence in Latin America. Citizen Security, Democracy and the State (pp. 125-152). Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
-Thrift, N. (2008). Non-Representational Theory. Space, Politics, Affect. New York: Oxford University Press.
-Valenzuela Aguilera, A. (2013). Urban Surges. Power, Territory, and the Social Control of Space in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives, 40(2), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x12466834
-Vanin, F. (2019). Investigation urban elites through fear and security in Porto Alegre. Urban Geography, 40(5), 684-698. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1629221
-Villarreal, A. (2015). Fear and Spectacular Drug Violence in Monterrey. En J. Auyero, P. Bourgois y N. Scheper-Hughes (Eds.), Violence at the Urban Margins (pp. 135-161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-Villarreal Montemayor, A. T. (2016). Drug violence, Fear of Crime and the Everyday Life in the Mexican Metropolis. Berkeley: Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
-von Wissel, C. (2012). So far so close: Compact periphery as a way of life. Volume, 32, 16-22.
-Williams, R. (1961). The Long Revolution. London: Penguin Books.
-Williams, R. (1979). Politics and Letters. Interviews with New Left Review. London: New Left Books.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Política de acceso abierto
Los autores que publiquen en Espiral Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, Espiral reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial, el cual será cedido a la Universidad de Guadalajara para su difusión en acceso abierto.
Espiral no realiza cargos a los autores por enviar y procesar artículos para su publicación.
Los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales, independientes y adicionales, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en Espiral, por ejemplo, incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o darlo a conocer en otros medios en papel o electrónicos, siempre que indique clara y explícitamente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en Espiral.
Para todo lo anterior, los autores deben remitir el formato de carta-cesión de la propiedad de los derechos de la publicación debidamente llenado y firmado por los autores cuando el artículo ha sido aceptado para publicación. Este formato debe ser solicitado al correo electrónico espiral.udeg@gmail.com, y debe ser adjuntado en archivo PDF paralelamente al envío, o como máximo 24 horas posteriores al envío del material.
Los lectores/usuarios de Espiral pueden acceder directamente al contenido de manera libre y gratuita al momento que un nuevo número es colocado en la plataforma. Se permite al lector/usuario citar, compartir (electrónicamente y de manera física), imprimir y distribuir el material siempre que se indique de manera clara y explícitamente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en Espiral. Es necesario citar de manera correcta el trabajo y no debe de ser utilizado con fines de lucro.