![Espiral Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad [eISSN: 2594-021X]](https://espiral.cucsh.udg.mx/public/journals/10/pageHeaderLogoImage_es_ES.jpg)
To reread to Daniel Bell. Forty years after the publication of The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/espiral.v24i68.5741Keywords:
capitalism, Daniel Bell, modernism, cultural contradictions, social theory.Abstract
The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, published by Daniel Bell in 1976, exercised a visible influence on the intellectual debates of those years and it has maintained a relatively constant presence in sociological literature. Bell argued mainly that culture had radically changed in a direction that made it incompatible with the reproduction of the capitalist economy. Forty years after the appearance of the book, in this article we seek to assess the consistency of this thesis. The perspective is critic. We want to show its weaknesses revealing the misuse of Weber’s idea concerning the relationship between protestant ethic and development of capitalism, the shortcomings of the theory of society built by Bell in order to settle the existence of contradictions and the adoption of concepts of culture and religion restrictives.Downloads
References
Assadourian, E., Amadeo, M., Starke, L., y Worldwatch Institute (2010). Transforming cultures: from consumerism to sustainability: a Worldwatch Institute report on progress toward a sustainable society. Londres: Norton.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming life. Cambridge-Malden: Polity Press.
Bell, D. (1960). The end of ideology. Glencoe: The free press.
–––––– (1970). “The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism”. The public interest, (21), 16-43.
–––––– (1996). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. Twentieth anniversary edition. Nueva York: Basic Books.
–––––– (1997). Towards the year 2000. Work in progress. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
–––––– y Kristol, I. (1969). Confrontations: The student rebellion and the universities. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Bellah, R. N. (1985). Habits of the heart: individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bensman, J., y Vidich, A. J. (1972). “The Cultural Contradictions of Daniel Bell”. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 6(1/2), 53-65.
Berger, P. (1999). El dosel sagrado. Para una teoría sociológica de la religión. Barcelona: Kairós.
Bloom, A. (1986). Prodigal sons: the New York intellectuals & their world. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Bok, S. (1978). Lying: moral choice in public and private life. Nueva York: Pantheon Books.
Cairncross, F., y Cairncross, A. (eds.). (1992). The Legacy of the golden age: the 1960s and their economic consequences. Londres-Nueva York: Routledge.
Crittenden, B. (1972). “A Demurral to Daniel Bell’s The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism”. Journal of Aesthetic
Education, 6(1/2), 139-145.
Crozier, M., Huntington, S. P., Watanuki, J., y Trilateral Commission (1975). The crisis of democracy: report on the governability of democracies to the Trilateral Commission. Nueva York: New York University Press.
De Certeau, M. (2007). La invención de lo cotidiano. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
De la Fuente, E. (2013). “‘Profane’ rather than ‘secular’ Daniel Bell as cultural sociologist and critic of modern culture”. Thesis Eleven, 118(1), 105-115.
Durkheim, E. (2012). Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Elster, J. (1998). “A plea for mechanisms”, en P. Hedstrøm, y R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (pp. 45-73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Featherstone, M. (1991). Consumer culture and postmodernism. Londres: Sage.
Franchetti, C. (2013). “A reconsideration of Werner Sombart’s Luxury and capitalism”. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 135-139.
Friedman, M. (2005). The neoconservative revolution: Jewishintellectuals and the shaping of public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, J. (1983). “La ruptura entre cultura y sociedad. Crítica a la cultura de los neoconservadores”. Nueva Sociedad, (68), 27-32.
–––––– (1991). Problemas de legitimación en el capitalismo tardío. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Hampshire, S. (1978). Public and private morality. Cambridge- Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Hefner, R. W. (1998). Market cultures: society and morality in the new Asian capitalisms. Boulder: Westview Press.
Hollis, M. (1977). Models of man: philosophical thoughts on social action. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Horowitz, D. (2005). Anxieties of affluence: critiques of American consumer culture 1939-1979. Boston: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Illouz, E. (1992). Consuming the romantic utopia. Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Isserman, M., y Kazin, M. (2000). America divided: the civil war of the 1960s. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Jumonville, N. (2007). The New York intellectuals reader. Nueva York: Routledge.
Krauze, E. (2011). “Nuestro Jeremías. Daniel Bell (1919-2011)”. Letras libres, XIII(marzo), 46-48.
Lange, H., y Meier, L. (2009). The new middle classes: globalizing lifestyles, consumerism and environmental concern. Dordrecht-Londres: Springer.
Löwy, M. (2004). “Le concept d’affinité élective chez Max ,Weber”. Archives de sciences sociales des religions, (127), 93-103.
MacDonald, K. B. (1998). The culture of critique: an evolutionary ,analysis of Jewish involvement in twentieth-century intellectual and political movements. Westport: Praeger.
Macfarlane, A. (1993). La cultura del capitalismo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Marglin, S. A., y Schor, J. B. (1992). The Golden age of capitalism. Reinterpreting the experience of postwar. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Merton, R. K. (1938). “Social Structure and Anomie”. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682.
Muñiz, J. N. (1978). “Cultura y crisis en el capitalismo avanzado. Acotaciones en torno a Daniel Bell”. Reis, (1), 283-292.
Offe, C. (1990). Contradicciones en el estado del bienestar. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Oliver, P. (2014). Hinduism and the 1960s: the rise of a counter-culture. Nueva York: Bloosmbury.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe: Free Press.
Phillips, G. (1978). “A Commentary on Daniel Bell’s Book The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism”. Leonardo, 11(1), 49-51.
Rubinstein, W. D. (1993). Capitalism, culture, and decline in Britain, 1750-1990. Londres-Nueva York: Routledge.
Sombart, W. (1979). Lujo y capitalismo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Stone, L. (1986). El pasado y el presente. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Touraine, A. (1971). The post-industrial society; tomorrow’s social history: classes, conflicts and culture in the programmed society. Nueva York: Random House.
Yates, J., y Hunter, J. D. (2011). Thrift and thriving in America. Capitalism and Moral Order from the Puritans to the Present. Nueva York: The Oxford University Press.
Villegas, F. G. (2013). Max Weber y la guerra académica de los cien años. La polémica en torno a La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo (1905-2012). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Waters, M. (2003). “Daniel Bell”, en G. Ritzer (cood.), The Blackwell companion to major classical social theorists (pp. 154-177). Malden: Blackwell.
Weber, M. (1987). “La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo”, en, Ensayos sobre sociología de la religión. Tomo 1 (pp. 25-232). Madrid: Taurus.
Whiteley, S. (1992). The space between the notes: rock and the counter-culture. Londres-Nueva York: Routledge.
Wuthnow, R. (1996). Actos de compasión: cuidar de los demás y ayudarnos a nosotros mismos. Madrid: Alianza.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Open access policy
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
In accordance with the legislation of copyright, Espiral Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad recognizes and respects the moral rights of the authors, as well as their equity ownership, which will be given to the journal to for diffusion on open access. Espiral does not charge authors for sending and processing their articles for publication.
The authors are able to engage in independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article’s version published in Espiral (for example, to include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in Espiral.
For all of the above, the authors (s) must send a format of a letter of transfer of property rights on the first publication duly completed and signed by the author (s). This format can be sent via email in PDF file to the email espiral.udeg@gmail.com. (Letter of transfer of author property rights)
